Uncovering Bias: Toward a More Effective Voir Dire
نویسنده
چکیده
Judge Mark W. Bennett of the Northern District of Iowa calls himself a “true believer” of implicit bias, having instructed jurors on this subject for more than 8 years from the bench. He has developed a set of jury instructions to educate jurors on the existence of their biases and holds them accountable by signing their name consenting to be fair during trial. To emphasize the importance of this process, Judge Bennett describes an instance where a juror initially said she would be unbiased but when she had to sign her commitment to the jury instruction, she admitted she would find the Hispanic defendant guilty simply because he is Hispanic.
منابع مشابه
Voir Dire Efficacy In Highly Publicized Criminal Cases
VOIR DIRE EFFICACY IN HIGHLY PUBLICIZED CRIMINAL CASES by DAVID M.ZIMMERMAN Adviser: Margaret Bull Kovera Whether judges and attorneys are able to detect bias among potential jurors (venirepersons) is a pivotal concern in highly publicized cases in which most of the jury pool has been exposed to pretrial publicity (PTP). The current dissertation research addressed 1) whether attorneys and judge...
متن کاملUNRAVELING THE GORDIAN KNOT OF IMPLICIT BIAS IN JURY SELECTION: THE PROBLEMS OF JUDGE-DOMINATED VOIR DIRE, THE FAILED PROMISE OF BATSON, AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS Judge
Republished with permission of the President and Fellows of Harvard College, from Judge Mark W. Bennett, Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Bias in Jury Selection: The Problems of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions, 4 HAR. L. & POL’Y REV 149 (2010); permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. The article was reprinted from Westl...
متن کاملPower to Bias? The Effect of Attorney Empowerment in Voir Dire on Jury Prejudice and Race∗†
Giving attorneys more power in the voir dire (jury selection) process may allow them to 1) more easily dismiss jurors whom they wish to strike on a priori grounds; 2) acquire information that enables them to identify favorably-inclined jurors more precisely; or both. Attorneys who are more skilled can better leverage their increased power to retain the jurors they prefer. We show theoretically ...
متن کاملModeling Juror Bias
We consider the implications of the definition of juror bias offered in Schwartz and Schwartz for optimal use of juror challenges to improve the accuracy of the jury process. For them, bias consists of a juror assinging more/less weight to the evidence for guilt than would be assigned by the median juror in a fully representative pool of jurors. When juror assessments of the evidence have a pro...
متن کاملStacking the Jury: Legal Professionals' Peremptory Challenges Reflect Jurors' Levels of Implicit Race Bias.
Most legal systems are based on the premise that defendants are treated as innocent until proven guilty and that decisions will be unbiased and solely based on the facts of the case. The validity of this assumption has been questioned for cases involving racial minority members, in that racial bias among jury members may influence jury decisions. The current research shows that legal profession...
متن کامل